Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

Well that wasn’t the point of my comparison, but on the one issue I was aware of at the time (”the Giant Sucking Sound”) Perot was without question ahead of his time.

And pretty much standing boldly all alone, saying so.

Can’t say one way or the other, if your other statements are accurate as I don’t have any other information to compare them with.

My point was, we had two candidates at the time. Perot siphoned off enough, to in some people’s view, change the results of the election.

May or may not be the case. I was just making an observation...


10 posted on 05/20/2012 7:50:13 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America doesn't need any new laws. America needs freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Cringing Negativism Network
My point was, we had two candidates at the time. Perot siphoned off enough, to in some people’s view, change the results of the election.

It was Bush's fault he lost the election. NEVER accept blame for Clinton's election.

Daddy Bush a) sucked and b) was too cool for us and c) didn't take care of business.

So screw him, he lost. Perot lost. We lost. Only Bubba won anything, and he screwed that up.

RiNO's can go to hell.

74 posted on 05/21/2012 12:56:55 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson