Zero minus zero equals zero.
Mitt Romney is not “my” candidate
Well, Jeff, if you are supporting him he is your candidate. That's just reality.
If elected then, there is the chance that he will do at least some of these types of things.
To believe that you have to ignore the entire history of the Neville Chamberlainesque elite faction that Mitt Romney represents.
As you the rest of your wish list, can you point me some examples of liberal Republicans working to get spending, and entitlements, and the size and scope of government under any kind of control?
EV, we have posted back and forth for several years. You know my positions.
Romney’s stances on the issues, which he is runnong on now, are far, far better than Obama’s so it is not a zero sum game at all.
If we can elect a Tea Party oriented majority in the House and Seante (or clearly be heading in that direction), which is what we have to do in any case, then we will be able to have the environment where they serve up the Acts and legislation that will cause Romney to keep his campaign stances and commitments. That’s how we have to do it.
We may not get nearly all we want...but if we do that, the economy and many things will turn around.
With Obama there is no chance of that.
Have a great day EV...even though we see differently on how to react to the GOP putting Romney up there, which is surely not what I wanted, we can work together on the House and Seant which is something we have to do in any case.
God’s speed.
>> “As you the rest of your wish list, can you point me some examples of liberal Republicans working to get spending, and entitlements, and the size and scope of government under any kind of control?” <<
.
Can you point us to how voting for a candidate that cannot possibly get elected will bring that about?
.
Why don’t YOU go play on the rail road tracks you JERK and leave decent people alone!