I would take him over Obama at this point...
Not me. Clinton's only saving grace was the economy, and that was due to factors he had nothing to do with like the tech jobs created by the advent of eccommerce and Y2K, not having to budget for the Cold War, and doing little in the WOT.
Clinton's failure in leadership may have costed us a chance to get Bin Laden bloodlessly, which both Bush and Obama have had to pay for. The MSM tries to frame the WOT as starting in 2001, but Bin Laden attacked us throughout the Clinton years, too. The MSM successully kept our attention off of Bin Laden's attacks and on all of those jobs created by ecommerce and Y2K, thus the memory of the "peace and prosperity of the Clinton years".
Take away the tech boom, throw in the cost of the WOT, and Clinton's economy would have been no better than Obama's. At least Obama made the call to get OBL when he had the opportunity, so I'll take him over Clinton.
What a choice we have between a white president who hates whites and a black president who hates whites. Matter of fact, it seems that the whole Democrat establishment hates whites.