Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markman46

Too bad they couldn’t shut the one down and launch on the remaining 8. Maybe in future designs...


71 posted on 05/19/2012 2:10:56 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Errant

I always get nervous with engine counts of more than 5. The Soviets (as you might recall) never developed the large-capacity engines (like the Saturn V’s F-1) and relied on multiple smaller engines. Their moon rocket (the N-1) might actually have succeeded IF the first stage didn’t have to rely on the perfect sychronization of something like 22 engines.

To me, more engines = more that can go wrong.Today could be mild proof of that.


72 posted on 05/19/2012 2:17:32 AM PDT by hoagy62 ("Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered..."-Thomas Paine. 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Errant

they need all 9 at launch can lose 2 and still reach orbit


82 posted on 05/19/2012 10:19:58 PM PDT by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson