Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tublecane

I wish I could give you a citation, because I can’t recall where they did this - it isn’t in the charging affidavit. It may have just been Corey’s statement in the press conference. That’s why I said they “implied” it, but I remember commenting at the time that this would have to be the only way they could try to allege that Zimmerman had started the confrontation in a way that might forfeit his right to self-defense.


237 posted on 05/18/2012 12:37:39 PM PDT by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]


To: PhatHead

Pot is known to make some people paranoid, and for that reason Mr. Z may not have been “wise” to approached the stoned Mr. M. But Mr. Z sure as heck did not violate any law if he did, short of (again as you suggest) purposely brandishing his pistol at Mr. M. Just letting the pistol be seen isn’t a threat, or every cop walking down the street would be a threat.


239 posted on 05/18/2012 12:41:33 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Mitt! You're going to have to try harder than that to be "severely conservative" my friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson