To: philman_36
And if it is "settled law", as you claim, then you'll also need to explain why there have been so many attempts, even as late as 2008, @to change Article 2, Section 1.Good question, I'll look forward to reading the response you get.
126 posted on
05/20/2012 7:20:08 AM PDT by
Las Vegas Ron
(Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio - http://www.istandwithrush.org/)
To: Las Vegas Ron
It defies logic! If it’s already “settled law” then there would be no need to seek the changes being sought after.
128 posted on
05/20/2012 7:35:44 AM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Las Vegas Ron; philman_36
Me to. If there is one I’d appreciate a ping if it’s not too much trouble.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson