I guess I will post this again every week or so. Anyone who thinks that the citizenship of the parents has any legal impact on eligibility of a person to hold the office of President under Article II, Section 1 is not being realistic.
Real Constitutional Lawyers react to this argument the same way the ALJ in Georgia did; the same way the well known Constitutional Lawyer who wrote the Congressional Research Service opinion did; the same way the academic Constitutional Law bar reacts--we don't listen to the argument because it is settled law that a person born in the United States under any circumstances is a Natural Born Citizen for all purposes.
The difference between Mitt Romney and the individual presently living in the White House as nominal President is that Romney was born in the United States; there is no evidence that Zero was born in the United States--in fact the only admissible evidence in the public record is that he was born in Mombasa Kenya.
Although I do not believe Zero was in fact born in Kenya, the record should be sufficient to put the burden of proof on him to show where he was born and competent counsel would create that kind of record in a proceeding instead of wasting a court's time on this flaky argument about citizenship of parents that has no merit.
You think he was not born in Kenya; does that mean you think he was born in the US or somewhere else?
Were and when was it settled? I would really like you to explain that to me.
Was it a court case? Was it passed legislation? Was it the 14th Amendment?
A link to an article or a post where you explained this would suffice.
And please don't say it's from English common law. Common law in America is precedence established from court cases, not "tradition" or some other BS.
And if it is "settled law", as you claim, then you'll also need to explain why there have been so many attempts, even as late as 2008, @to change Article 2, Section 1.
If it's "settled" law then were are our legislators still seeking to change it after all this time?
So basically Hamas or OBL could send one of their pregnant wives to America. She would have a anchor baby here so that one day their child could be POTUS?
I missed the birth in New York you mentioned. Is it in your forum posts?
Also what do you think of the book, I believe Pigeon (?) who says Obama changed his name in Canada and he was probably born in Washington state?
OMG, why are we even here wondering about this lunatic man's past?! Laws must be passed so we know who we elect. Who they are and who they bow too.
And if it is "settled law", as you claim, then you'll also need to explain why there have been so many attempts, even as late as 2008, @to change Article 2, Section 1.
If it's "settled" law then why were are our legislators still seeking to change it after all this time?
Your longevity doesn't render you with an immunity of any sort.
You're supposed to be a lawyer. It should be a simple matter to answer the question.