Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye
Minor vs. Happersett has and that can be viewed as settled law."

It has never been cited by the courts in connection with eligibility for the Presidency under the Constitution.

620 posted on 05/17/2012 4:17:05 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 616 | View Replies ]


To: kabar

But it does provide a SCOTUS’ definition of ‘natural born citizen.’ The Constitution provides all the context necessary to apply that to POTUS and VPOTUS qualifications. No need for the courts to belabor that with those two things in hand.


631 posted on 05/17/2012 4:25:38 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 620 | View Replies ]

To: kabar

Are you braindead?!

It doesn’t matter - it is still the law.


636 posted on 05/17/2012 4:32:40 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 620 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson