To: TigersEye
Minor vs. Happersett has and that can be viewed as settled law."It has never been cited by the courts in connection with eligibility for the Presidency under the Constitution.
620 posted on
05/17/2012 4:17:05 PM PDT by
kabar
To: kabar
But it does provide a SCOTUS’ definition of ‘natural born citizen.’ The Constitution provides all the context necessary to apply that to POTUS and VPOTUS qualifications. No need for the courts to belabor that with those two things in hand.
631 posted on
05/17/2012 4:25:38 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
To: kabar
Are you braindead?!
It doesn’t matter - it is still the law.
636 posted on
05/17/2012 4:32:40 PM PDT by
SatinDoll
(NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson