Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

If I’m not mistaken, that clause reads, or at least read back then, that the unmarried U.S. citizen mother could transmit her “nationality” to her foreign-born baby.

“Nationality” and “citizenship” are two distinct legal terms: while all citizens of the U.S. are also nationals of the U.S., not all ationals of the U.S. are also citizens of the U.S. For example, American Samoans are nationals of the U.S., but not citizens of the U.S. Nationals of the U.S. may travel to and (I believe) work within the U.S., but do not have rights reserved for citizens (such as voting in U.S. elections and passing on U.S. citizenship via jus sanguinis).

Thus, unless I’m missing something, an unwed mother would pass on her U.S. nationality to her foreign-born son who was not a U.S. citizen at birth under some other law, which would allow her child to live and (eventually) work in the U.S. But she wouldn’t pass on her U.S. citizenship.


432 posted on 05/17/2012 2:02:00 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]


To: AuH2ORepublican
Immigration and Nationality Act TITLE III
452 posted on 05/17/2012 2:12:12 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies ]

To: AuH2ORepublican

But there is/was a residency stipulation and his mother didn’t meet the qualification because she wasn’t old enough (5 years after 14th birthday and she was only 4 or less years after her 14th birthday).


605 posted on 05/17/2012 4:02:45 PM PDT by DallasDeb (usafa06mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson