Yesterday Judge Forrest said :
“The government was given a number of opportunities at the hearing and in its briefs to state unambiguously that the type of expressive and associational activities engaged in by plaintiffs --or others --are not within Section 1021. It did not. This court therefore must credit the chilling impact on First Amendment rights as reasonable --and real.”
Wow! Who would ever have thought that an Obama appointee would follow the Constitution? Good for her.
Thank God. Most others just are worried about if they are having steak for dinner tonight
Worth reading ping!
OMG! I’m agreeing with an Obama appointed NY judge ?!
I believe the Chicago Way allows provisions for exceptions to the ruling of this judge.
This is why SCOTUS is so important in this next election. 1-3 seats on the highest court that will limit the progressive agenda for the next decades.
I have little faith in the GOP congress. That is especially true in the Senate. If the Progressives stack the court it will be a nightmare.
Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Ben Cardin (D-Md.), Al Franken (D-Minn.), Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Jim Risch (R-Idaho), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) and Tom Coburn (R-Okla.).