[Mouton]

If I recall correctly, when Zimmerman’s attorney was questioning the prosecutor’s office detective during the bond hearing, did he not ask him if he had seen the medical files. I believe he responded no. I think the attorney then asked if he would like to see them but said the prosecution has an avenue to obtain them.

Having the records shown on the state’s evidence list indicates to me this is a lame attempt to provide esculpatory evidence now rather than in the complaint in which it belonged. If that is true and if it is also correct they had the medical file at the time of charging, they could be in deep legal do do with the judge. This case could get tossed long before trial on a prosecutorial error which would be great.

Bring popcorn when the preliminary hearing begins. If the state has nothing more than is indicated by the witness list, they have no chargable case.

[Taylor42]

they could be in deep legal do do with the judge

This case ceased being about the evidence during media circus. Now it's primarily about skin color and retribution. This may get real ugly!

[Gay State Conservative]

Yours is the type of response that *this* rank amateur would only expect from a trained lawyer.Assuming you are your hunch that the judge might toss this case seems to me to be the right call...particularly given the evidence that's recently been revealed by the press.If,by chance,the judge *does* toss the case would he/she do so *with* or *without* prejudice?