Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LSUfan

The problem is P-3 airframes. They’ve had it. Designed, I believe, for 20,000 hours. Some have exceeded 60,000 and they are just worn out. The P-8 is a 737-800EX variant and no, it is not a good replacement for ASW work. It wull fly at 20,000 feet and do high altitude ASW. The problem is that high altitude ASW doesn’t work after the detection phase. The Navy wanted 156 P-8s. That is down to 107 officially. Won’t happen. Will end-up with one operational squadron on each coast plus some in HI — which will then be moved to Guam. Since 1991 we have basically abandoned ASW and AMW.


13 posted on 05/16/2012 6:49:26 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: pabianice

It’s kinda hard to go ‘low and slow’ with a 737.

Oh, how I remeber the fun of sneaking up on russian ‘trawlers’, and scaring the crapp out of them.

We considered damage due to salt water intake to be part of the job. That’s why God and the Navy gave us four engines.


15 posted on 05/16/2012 6:59:13 AM PDT by maine yankee (I got my Governor at 'Marden's')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
It wull fly at 20,000 feet and do high altitude ASW.

Once gain you are quite mistaken.

18 posted on 05/16/2012 8:45:10 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson