Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lormand

He’s an office holder from Texas who has bigger celebrity outside of the state and rather than meet the needs of his constituents would rather go off on the road for a party he does not support supported by voters who are not in the party he uses the banner of.

If he really wanted to kick up some dust and challenge the status quo, he would’ve run as a Democrat this time and challenged Obama to a series of debates. That’s how to question the policies. No one is questioning Obama on the issues yet and he was not vetted in 2008.

He would’ve gotten at least 20% support running as a Rat this year.


9 posted on 05/15/2012 7:29:39 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Barack Obama has cut and run from what he called "the right war".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: a fool in paradise
Agreed. The myth is that if Wrong Paul ran third party, he would hurt the GOP the most. I totally disagree. I think it would hemmorage more RAT votes than GOP votes.

Here in Austin, I work among many WrongPaul-bots. A majority are disheartened Obama-bots and single issue 'legalize' voters....not to mention 911 conspiracy lunatics.

10 posted on 05/16/2012 7:48:56 AM PDT by lormand (A Government who robs Peter to pay Paul, will always have the support of Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson