Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wtc911

Correct, long hair on men did not become prevalent until the “summer of love” in 1967. That’s when The Beatles started growing their hair long. Of course, The Beatles were considered to have long hair when they hit the scene in 1964 but their “mop-hair” style of that 1964=66 period would be considered somewhat short today.


54 posted on 05/11/2012 1:10:34 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (Today, I officially outlive Phil Hartman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: SamAdams76
The Beatles were considered to have long hair when they hit the scene in 1964

Moe was way ahead of the curve


55 posted on 05/11/2012 1:12:07 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76; wtc911
Correct, long hair on men did not become prevalent until the "summer of love" in 1967. That's when The Beatles started growing their hair long. Of course, The Beatles were considered to have long hair when they hit the scene in 1964 but their "mop-hair" style of that 1964=66 period would be considered somewhat short today.

Exactly so. In the 1963-1966 era here in the DC Metro area if a boy's hair started to touch his ears, he was a "hairtree". My first thought of the alleged victim's "long bleached hair" was that he was a "surfer wannabee" and fan of the Beach Boys, Jan an Dean, etc. Easy to forget that they were the chartbusters, soon to be displaced by the British Invasion.

The local surfer wannabees combed their hair forward and many had DIY bleach jobs using hydrogen peroxide and Clorox to do the job. Even coined the term cloroxide. They sure as hell weren't going to buy Breck products at that time. That would have been sissy as all get out.

White slacks and awning striped shirts and no socks completed the outfit.

Madras button down shirts were very popular for the guys and Villager outfits for the girls. Now and again some young buck would feel rebellious and wear a pair of black or wheat colored Lee's and Dingo boots. Friday's were coat and tie.

56 posted on 05/11/2012 1:44:26 PM PDT by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76; wtc911
Correct, long hair on men did not become prevalent until the "summer of love" in 1967. That's when The Beatles started growing their hair long. Of course, The Beatles were considered to have long hair when they hit the scene in 1964 but their "mop-hair" style of that 1964=66 period would be considered somewhat short today.

Exactly so. In the 1963-1966 era here in the DC Metro area if a boy's hair started to touch his ears, he was a "hairtree". My first thought of the alleged victim's "long bleached hair" was that he was a "surfer wannabee" and fan of the Beach Boys, Jan an Dean, etc. Easy to forget that they were the chartbusters, soon to be displaced by the British Invasion.

The local surfer wannabees combed their hair forward and many had DIY bleach jobs using hydrogen peroxide and Clorox to do the job. Even coined the term cloroxide. They sure as hell weren't going to buy Breck products at that time. That would have been sissy as all get out.

White slacks and awning striped shirts and no socks completed the outfit.

Madras button down shirts were very popular for the guys and Villager outfits for the girls. Now and again some young buck would feel rebellious and wear a pair of black or wheat colored Lee's and Dingo boots. Friday's were coat and tie.

57 posted on 05/11/2012 1:44:26 PM PDT by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson