At this point, it is simple math.
Science fraud and butterfly expert Paul R. Ehrlich wrote The Population Bomb in the 1970s, calling for vast reductions in the number of humans on Earth, by totalitarian means, “for the environment”.
He was *never* disavowed by his supporters, despite each and every one of his apocalyptic predictions failing miserably.
Science fraud and snake expert Eric Pianka, at the U of Texas, Austin, gave a lecture called for the eradication of 9/10ths of the people on Earth via pulmonary (coughing and sneezing) transmitted Ebola virus, “for the environment”.
He was greeted with wild applause by the “hundred scientists and students” who heard what was supposed to be his secret lecture. Only one scientist was horrified, and contacted the FBI, who did nothing.
James Hansen, head of NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS), has endorsed the book ‘Time’s Up’, by Keith Farnish, that “calls for cities to be razed to the ground, industrial civilization to be destroyed and genocidal population reduction measures to be implemented in the name of preventing climate change.”
What all such people have in common is that they believe that the world is heading towards apocalyptic destruction, and the only way to stop it (?) is by exterminating billions of people, and giving total power to dictatorial regimes bent on returning the world to an idealistic primitive, agrarian state, that has never existed nor could exist.
Clearly these people are “mad scientists” far worse than the fictional Dr. Frankenstein, and their singular intent is to wipe out the human species.
Therefore, ignoring them is not possible. They are dangerous fanatics who seek to carry out genocide and plunge the world into chaos. They need to be identified and imprisoned as a threat to not just society, but mankind itself.
To give any kind of credence to their ravings is to support them in their insane quest. They must be disavowed, for their intent is evil beyond any previous human example of evil.
To give any kind of credence to their ravings is to support them in their insane quest. They must be disavowed, for their intent is evil beyond any previous human example of evil.
There is some strong consensus science behind the greenhouse effect and the rise of CO2 causing some beneficial warming. Even the Stern report, heavily biased towards all forms of speculative catastrophe admitted that warming has short run net benefits. What the leftists refuse to admit is that mankind will flourish in the long run without their help regardless of any climate change or not; and mankind will wither away if they are put in charge of anything. I refuse to let the leftists define the debate with their tactics (equating skepticism with denial, etc), but I also refuse to ignore science which is very well established.
I never have understood why these people who are so dedicated and such true believers don’t start the ball rolling by offing themselves and their families first. Think about it; Oskar Schindler only saved a few hundred people at the end of WW2, now those people number in the tens of thousands. There must be several million global warming believers world wide; if they would just kill themselves and their families now they could probably reduce the global population by close to a billion in just two generations.