Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625; Jim Robinson
I think that is one of the reason's Jim made this a non-Romney location. He could see the overall picture and the overall picture showed that some of the Romney supporters were more interested in dividing the rest of us....keeping us from “uniting around one person” then in supporting their candidate.......

Years ago threw away my vote and voted for Perot.... we got Clinton. Because of Clinton's moral behavior and the “D” national party support of him, the switch began: the totally democrat county I moved to thirty years ago elected 100% republicans in the 2010 election. Request for ballot in this primary was 2:1 in favor of the “R”.

From not being able to field a candidate for public office in the 70—80s to having a full slate, with choices for the “R” ballot can be initially traced back to Clinton's election and culminated with BO’s win in IN.

22 posted on 05/10/2012 5:49:48 AM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: hoosiermama

First - voting for Perot was not ‘throwing away your vote.” You voted for the person you saw as the best candidate. The ones who “threw away their vote” were the fools who claimed they wanted Perot but the media had warned them that would be “throwing away their vote.” Second, Clinton was certainly no prize but, let’s be honest with ourselves, Bush #1 was certainly no conservative. What we had was Perot and two nearly identical candidates - one of them had an “R” behind his name but was shown to be no friend to conservatives. Bush I was the original Republican sell-out and we have been stuck with more of the same since that time.


35 posted on 05/10/2012 2:48:48 PM PDT by onevoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson