To summarize, your point is well-taken that you did not specifically mention Romney's proclivities as to disastrous judicial appointments. Romney is actually a MUCH broader problem than SCOTUS and judges and a considerably worse problem than Obozo is capable of being. Romney is a problem across the board for those who are neither trust fund babies nor other members of the pampered, powdered and privileged class. The planted axiom was that somehow there might be a legitimate argument that Romney is somehow better than Obozo.
I won’t bother now to get into a detailed discussion of the evidence as to whether Obama or Romney would be worse for the country. I’m sure that will be discussed time after time between now and the election. I’ll continue to read — or at least skim through — much of what Republicans, Democrats, and independents argue in opposition to voting for Romney (primarily to find weaknesses in their arguments, I admit).
I’ll consider the points that are made, though, and be willing to recognize strengths in the arguments of others if I come across them. So far, though, I’m not anywhere close to being convinced. If anything, I hope I’ll be able to convince others to come over to my way of thinking.