1 posted on
05/07/2012 12:51:16 PM PDT by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
Just lop their friggin’ heads, say “whoops,” and be done with it!
2 posted on
05/07/2012 12:53:21 PM PDT by
ScottinVA
(Buying Drain-O requires photo I.D... so should voting!)
To: Kaslin
The defense attorney should have been cited for contempt of court and sentenced to 30 days. By her saying that the court should order women to dress in burkas is the same as saying that the court itself was disrespectful.
How far we have fallen.
4 posted on
05/07/2012 1:01:45 PM PDT by
Salvavida
(The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
To: Kaslin
They were sneering and laughing at the deaths of all the people they killed on 9/11 and they expressed desire to do it again>That isn't making a mockery. It is a confession of guilt.
5 posted on
05/07/2012 1:02:11 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: Kaslin
At the time Obama proposed holding this trial in NY City, I thought
1) who the hell is advising him?
2) please, please, please - go ahead with the idea! It would cause an open, festering PR puss-sore for Obama which would remind Americans daily what a total ass he is.
7 posted on
05/07/2012 1:06:53 PM PDT by
PGR88
To: Kaslin
Castrate them with a shotgun, so they can’t enjoy their 72 virgins, and then disembowel the bastards. Why waste any more money on a trial? For once save the taxpayers some money!
8 posted on
05/07/2012 1:08:31 PM PDT by
The Sons of Liberty
(Sworn to Defend The Constitution Against ALL Enemies, Foreign and Domestic. So Help Me GOD!)
To: Kaslin
They didn’t seem to think that their heroes that drove planes into buildings were sinners for going to strip clubs and getting lap dances. Porn and murder is ok but looking at a woman that is not covered from head to toe is a sin.
11 posted on
05/07/2012 1:22:29 PM PDT by
Tenacious 1
(With regards to the GOP: I am prodisestablishmentarianistic!)
To: Kaslin
The whole world laughs at us. Guess who could care less?
13 posted on
05/07/2012 1:33:01 PM PDT by
oyez
( Yomomacare going done once, going down twice, going---..)
To: Kaslin
I say for prison garb we dress them up in brilliant red, orange, and yellow.
I think "fire" can do this rather nicely.
18 posted on
05/07/2012 2:04:32 PM PDT by
Repeat Offender
(While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy Saints surrounded)
To: Kaslin
The judge is the primary person at fault for losing control of the court room. Here's what a good judge would have said: I am the person and the only person who decide what is appropriate behavior in this court room. I see no one immodestly dressed, although I am VERY DEEPLY offended by yours, Ms. so-and-so. Your burqa suggests you reject human freedom and support a totalitarian society where the majority of women and children of both sexes are routinely raped, denied their most basic human rights, even the right to dress as they please, and treated like property. I will NOT be lectured by the defendants or by you on their behalf. Regarding conduct: I will NOT tolerate the hostile behavior your clients have already engaged in. Sitting in this court room is a privilege accorded in a free society. The defendants will get a fair trial despite their attempts to thwart justice, but they will NOT be allowed to disrupt the process. They have to earn the privilege of attending this trial by being polite and attentive. If the defendants fail to listen quietly and attentively, they will be escorted out of this courtroom.
The very next rude behavior by any of the defendants will result in their removal.
(And the judge should enforce that.) This has been done by other judges in similar circumstances.
To: Kaslin
the judge is at fault for losing control. A good judge would have said: I am the person and the only person who decide what is appropriate behavior in this court room. I see no one immodestly dressed, although I am VERY DEEPLY offended by yours, Ms. so-and-so. Your burqa suggests you support a totalitarian society where the majority of women and children of both sexes are routinely raped, denied their most basic human rights, even the right to dress as they please, and treated like property. I will NOT be lectured by the defendants or by you on their behalf. Regarding conduct: I will NOT tolerate the hostile behavior your clients have already engaged in. Sitting in this court room is a privilege accorded in a free society. The defendants will get a fair trial despite their attempts to thwart justice, but they will NOT be allowed to disrupt the process. They have to earn the privilege of attending this trial by being polite and attentive. If the defendants fail to listen quietly and attentively, they will be escorted out of this courtroom.
The very next rude behavior by any of the defendants will result in their removal.
(And the judge should enforce that.) This has been done by other judges in similar circumstances
To: Kaslin
Man, I just keep hoping that’s her way to try and get women to dress as promiscuously as possible without her clients being able to accuse her of doing so, so that they get to hire another lawyer in her place and make it stretch out longer.
I know it probably isn’t but I keep hoping!
21 posted on
05/07/2012 4:00:57 PM PDT by
lymelady
(Pro-life: Because I passed biology and history.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson