Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mockery Made of 9/11 Tribunal
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | May 7, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 05/07/2012 12:51:15 PM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 05/07/2012 12:51:16 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Just lop their friggin’ heads, say “whoops,” and be done with it!


2 posted on 05/07/2012 12:53:21 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Buying Drain-O requires photo I.D... so should voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
Just lop their friggin’ heads, say “whoops,” and be done with it!

I might get flamed for saying this, but that's what FDR would have done during a war, and pretty darn quick. Bush, and now Obama, evidently would disagree with FDR.

3 posted on 05/07/2012 12:58:47 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The defense attorney should have been cited for contempt of court and sentenced to 30 days. By her saying that the court should order women to dress in burkas is the same as saying that the court itself was disrespectful.

How far we have fallen.


4 posted on 05/07/2012 1:01:45 PM PDT by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
They were sneering and laughing at the deaths of all the people they killed on 9/11 and they expressed desire to do it again>

That isn't making a mockery. It is a confession of guilt.

5 posted on 05/07/2012 1:02:11 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

She further requested that the court order other women to follow her example so that the defendants wouldn’t have to avert their eyes ‘for fear of committing a sin under their faith

maybe they should poke their own eyes out then


6 posted on 05/07/2012 1:03:18 PM PDT by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

At the time Obama proposed holding this trial in NY City, I thought

1) who the hell is advising him?

2) please, please, please - go ahead with the idea! It would cause an open, festering PR puss-sore for Obama which would remind Americans daily what a total ass he is.


7 posted on 05/07/2012 1:06:53 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Castrate them with a shotgun, so they can’t enjoy their 72 virgins, and then disembowel the bastards. Why waste any more money on a trial? For once save the taxpayers some money!


8 posted on 05/07/2012 1:08:31 PM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Sworn to Defend The Constitution Against ALL Enemies, Foreign and Domestic. So Help Me GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: molson209

Blindfold them.


9 posted on 05/07/2012 1:09:46 PM PDT by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Not all the way......just enough for them to bleed out. Maybe they’ll see a glimmer of the hell they’re going to before it’s all over. Now THAT would be justice!!


10 posted on 05/07/2012 1:15:58 PM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They didn’t seem to think that their heroes that drove planes into buildings were sinners for going to strip clubs and getting lap dances. Porn and murder is ok but looking at a woman that is not covered from head to toe is a sin.


11 posted on 05/07/2012 1:22:29 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (With regards to the GOP: I am prodisestablishmentarianistic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
Just lop their friggin’ heads, say “whoops,” and be done with it!

Way too quick, think Daniel Pearl and try to visualize what he went through. Use a dull kitchen knife.

Terror is the only thing a terrorist respects so let him have what he wants. Feet first into an industrial shredder one at a time (with a pig for company) and save the "mastermind" for last. No virgins for you.

Regards,
GtG

12 posted on 05/07/2012 1:32:34 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The whole world laughs at us. Guess who could care less?


13 posted on 05/07/2012 1:33:01 PM PDT by oyez ( Yomomacare going done once, going down twice, going---..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

THEY SHOULD NOT EVEN BE IN COURT.
Until the war on terror is over.
Should be no trials until the war is over.
They are ‘illegal enemy combatants’, and
should be dealt with afterwards, like
the war criminals after WW2.

Now if their side never stops their war,
so be it, the bastards will die in gitmo.
That is way international law has worked.Ed


14 posted on 05/07/2012 1:37:38 PM PDT by hubel458
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: oyez

That arrogant, lazy, lying pos occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave of course. He is the one who made this country into a laughing stock in the whole world


15 posted on 05/07/2012 1:43:25 PM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Force-feed them bacon then hang them at the site of the Freedom Tower. Cut them down, cremate their bodies, and dump the ashes in the East River. Job done.

Screw their religion. As a Christian, how many places do I go per day where I could be offended and yet I’m expected to deal with it? Eff them.

}:-)4


16 posted on 05/07/2012 1:47:11 PM PDT by Moose4 ("Oderint dum metuant" -- "Let them hate, as long as they fear." (Lucius Accius, c. 130 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Don't give the 1600 Pennsylvania Ave resident all the credit. There are plenty so called american voters out to have him reelected.(Lower case “a” intentional.)
17 posted on 05/07/2012 1:59:31 PM PDT by oyez ( Yomomacare going done once, going down twice, going---..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I say for prison garb we dress them up in brilliant red, orange, and yellow.

I think "fire" can do this rather nicely.

18 posted on 05/07/2012 2:04:32 PM PDT by Repeat Offender (While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy Saints surrounded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The judge is the primary person at fault for losing control of the court room. Here's what a good judge would have said: I am the person and the only person who decide what is appropriate behavior in this court room. I see no one immodestly dressed, although I am VERY DEEPLY offended by yours, Ms. so-and-so. Your burqa suggests you reject human freedom and support a totalitarian society where the majority of women and children of both sexes are routinely raped, denied their most basic human rights, even the right to dress as they please, and treated like property. I will NOT be lectured by the defendants or by you on their behalf. Regarding conduct: I will NOT tolerate the hostile behavior your clients have already engaged in. Sitting in this court room is a privilege accorded in a free society. The defendants will get a fair trial despite their attempts to thwart justice, but they will NOT be allowed to disrupt the process. They have to earn the privilege of attending this trial by being polite and attentive. If the defendants fail to listen quietly and attentively, they will be escorted out of this courtroom.
The very next rude behavior by any of the defendants will result in their removal.
(And the judge should enforce that.) This has been done by other judges in similar circumstances.
19 posted on 05/07/2012 2:57:54 PM PDT by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

the judge is at fault for losing control. A good judge would have said: I am the person and the only person who decide what is appropriate behavior in this court room. I see no one immodestly dressed, although I am VERY DEEPLY offended by yours, Ms. so-and-so. Your burqa suggests you support a totalitarian society where the majority of women and children of both sexes are routinely raped, denied their most basic human rights, even the right to dress as they please, and treated like property. I will NOT be lectured by the defendants or by you on their behalf. Regarding conduct: I will NOT tolerate the hostile behavior your clients have already engaged in. Sitting in this court room is a privilege accorded in a free society. The defendants will get a fair trial despite their attempts to thwart justice, but they will NOT be allowed to disrupt the process. They have to earn the privilege of attending this trial by being polite and attentive. If the defendants fail to listen quietly and attentively, they will be escorted out of this courtroom.
The very next rude behavior by any of the defendants will result in their removal.
(And the judge should enforce that.) This has been done by other judges in similar circumstances


20 posted on 05/07/2012 3:01:28 PM PDT by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson