Personally, I believe it is a forgery, but it has not been proven in a court of law. Joe Arpaio's Cold Posse was not really an official law enforcement body. They were appointed by Arpaio at no cost to the government of Maricopa County or the state of Arizona. As far as I know, there have been no charges of criminality levied by anyone.
this isn’t rocket science and does not require the high priests of the supreme court to figure out. it was common wording used around the world for centuries.
Sorry, but that and a buck will get you a cup of coffee. Again, to state the obvious, we have someone in the WH who has been deemed to be eligible to hold that office and is acting as the President of the United States and the Commander in Chief. He is exercising the authority of that office and no one in our government has questioned his right to sign laws, order troops into harms way, issue executive orders, etc. Until we resolve this in the courts, what you and I think means diddly squat. As I have stated, this needs to be resolved sooner rather than later for the reasons I cited.
plenty of people have questioned it.
tens of millions believe he’s not eligible
but gutless cowards hem and haw over doing anything.
like i see here
and if you missed it, the common language was already addressed:
“The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their “
—
U.S. Supreme Court
Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 21 Wall. 162 162 (1874)
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/88/162/case.html