[LibLieSlayer]

What convoluted world of reason brought you to the point where you twist reality into that conclusion??? I want a Conservative party... the republican leadership is a progressive leadership and the party is a progressive party. I want to change that... and if the leadership makes that impossible... I want to destroy the republican party and replace it with one where the people that run it do not hate Conservatives more than they hate the dims and communists. Do you understand now?

LLS

[rogue yam]

I think you are making far less sense than you think you are.

You say you “want to destroy the republican party and replace it”.

I replied that I think doing this would result in fewer conservatives being elected over the next 8-12 years and asked you whether you agreed.

Building a third party would take time. Conservatives willing to abandon the GOP in the next few years will be a subset of all conservatives and an even smaller subset of all republicans. In the meantime the democrats would stay where they are. How could splitting the GOP vote against an undivided left result in anything other than more ‘Rat victories over the near term?

Even if you think that a third party more conservative than today’s GOP could eventually attract enough votes to elect Senators and Presidents, you can’t possibly be foolish enough to think this will happen immediately.

So the question remains: What do you expect the affect of your proposal would be on the make-up of the Congress and the White House over the next 8-12 years? I think it will result in fewer conservatives elected over that time period.

Do you really think otherwise? Or are you satisfied to bluster arrogantly and ignore the real-world consequences of your proposals?