Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/04/2012 4:18:09 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne

Just charge $20 per pack!


2 posted on 05/04/2012 4:22:33 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

They wanted folks to Quit smoking so they did, now they are crying becuse they thought to be a cash cow died.

Consequences hurt don’t they.


3 posted on 05/04/2012 4:23:36 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Wow, that was unexpected. >s


4 posted on 05/04/2012 4:24:33 PM PDT by Clay Moore (The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of a fool to the left. Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
...it effectively means the bondholders are being paid with their own money.

What a nightmare that has been created by these bumbling, yet devious fools.

Photobucket

5 posted on 05/04/2012 4:25:28 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

I thought the states were supposed to save all sorts of money in medical costs when they got people to quit smoking. So where are all those realized savings?


6 posted on 05/04/2012 4:27:24 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

How about an Obamacare-style solution — quit smoking but if you don’t continue to pay the tobacco taxes you can be fined, taxed, whatever by the IRS?


8 posted on 05/04/2012 4:29:40 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
Morons.

They win a huge settlement. Then they raise taxes on the product. Then they demonize and prevent its use. Then they borrow money on the revenue stream. Then there is no revenue stream.

Morons.

10 posted on 05/04/2012 4:32:00 PM PDT by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
the bondholders are being paid with their own money

Just like in a Ponzi scheme.

13 posted on 05/04/2012 5:01:46 PM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

“issued the bonds to receive billions of dollars upfront “

Greedy idiots.
Paying a premium to get the money upfront (and spent right away) instead of waiting for the payments.


14 posted on 05/04/2012 5:10:46 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
Well since this is about smoking quitting is not enough.

I do not have the link for the original study but here is some information.

"Researchers looked at over 400,000 people, comparing the level of vitamin B6 in their blood with their risk of later developing lung cancer. Those with above median levels of vitamin B6, were found to have a 50% lower risk of developing lung cancer 5 years later." Also required is "high levels of the essential amino acid methionine." And quitting is not enough. "The majority - yes the majority - of people who develop lung cancer now are former smokers, not current smokers."

"But for both current and former smokers above average levels of B6 and methionine reduced the risk by 50%."

Here

I do not like this: "It's important to note that this study was not a supplement study. Some vitamin supplements have actually been linked with a higher risk of developing lung cancer." I have read that vitamin E is an example but I have also read that nothing has been proved.

20 posted on 05/04/2012 8:31:29 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
Ah, ha! The Law of Unintended Consequences strikes again.

1. Smoking is bad. Therefore, raise taxes on cigarettes.

2, Smoking is bad. Demonize smokers and restrict where they can smoke.

3. Smoking is bad. Fund programs to get smokers to quit.

Add 1 through 3 together and you get DECREASED REVENUES to the taxing bodies of government.

Result: PANIC!

Smoking is good. Support your local Islamist cell or narco gang who are smuggling the smokes into the country. (Note: Tax revenue still still keeps going down and bond holders are about to be screwed. Scratch that . . . bond holders AND taxpayers are being lined up to get screwed.)

25 posted on 05/05/2012 10:24:50 PM PDT by MasterGunner01 (11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson