This thread is about Marco Rubio.
My arguments have been about Marco Rubio - whose parents were legal residents.
I do not think the children born of illegal residents should have U.S. citizenship at birth as their parents are in defiance of rather than subject to U.S. law.
Both 3D-JOY and the author tried to conflate Marco Rubio and anchor baby children of illegal immigrants.
Why the need to try to conflate the two?
My arguments have been about Marco Rubio - whose parents were legal residents.
And yet you've somehow, and unknowingly to your own mind, managed to venture into birthright citizenship.
I do not think the children born of illegal residents should have U.S. citizenship at birth as their parents are in defiance of rather than subject to U.S. law.
Good for you. Ummm...while we're on the subject...what exactly is an illegal resident and where is that defined in U.S. law?
Both 3D-JOY and the author tried to conflate Marco Rubio and anchor baby children of illegal immigrants.
Then provide the snippet of the article and the portion of the reply that does so.
Why the need to try to conflate the two?
You've yet to establish that such was done so why ask.