Replies

Yes - it’s a waste of time..it’s just and endless loop of jibber jabber that proves or solves nothing.

Like I said, I tend to agree with Sarah on all the birther crap - - “It’s distracting. It gets annoying. Let’s stick with what really matters.”

wait...don’t tell me - she’s the next to be thrown under the purity bus, right?

It is very telling to see you argue the Constitution and rule of law do not matter. The founders of the Confederate States of America argued that they had the right to reinterpret the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution in support of their overthrow of the U.S. Government with the secession of their States from the United States of America. After the decision by force of arms reestablished the authority of the Constitution, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) made a decision in a lawsuit involving the question of whether or not the contracts and acts of the rebel governments could be relied upon in a court of law after the end of the war. SCOTUS decided all of the acts of the unlawful rebel governments were without a lawful authority or basis and thereby null and void.

Likewise in a case in which a state governor was found to have been ineligible to the office of the governor at the time he was elected and inaugurated into the office of the governor, the state supreme court decided all of the ineligible governor’s accts of signing legislation into law, appointing officers and judges, and making executive orders were null and void, without effect in law.

Based on such historical precedents in law and other such precedents, it appears that the ineligibility of Obama implies all of his acts, appointments, and executive orders should be rendered null and void as a matter of law. If that isn’t a worthwhile expenditure of time and effort, nothing else can be.