Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream
So where does U.S. law contradict the above and state that naturalization covers those who are U.S. citizens at birth?

Let's just cut to the quick and settle what you're unwilling to state again here and now 'cause I've got dinner to fix.

@Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in those gaps. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:” December 16, 2008
Section 1401 is in USC 8. The Title is Aliens and Naturalization. That is naturalization law as you well know and anyone claiming that as the basis of their citizenship is in no manner a natural born citizen.

You're an after-birther. You've always been an after-birther. You don't want to understand. All you want to do is make a bloody mess of things.

109 posted on 05/04/2012 3:50:50 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36
You base a lot on what the name of USC 8 is.

Section 1401 is named “Nationals and U.S. citizens at birth”.

Those who are born citizens are in no need of naturalization.

What section of the law are you saying Marco Rubio was naturalized under?

120 posted on 05/04/2012 4:56:56 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to DC to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson