You’re not listening to the reasons people are giving you why Ron Paul isn’t supported.
The man doesn’t want the job!... as many Paul supporters you’re in denial.
Further he’s been protecting Romney’s flank from day one. Why would any one consider supporting Paul so he can hand it over to Romney?
I've read what's been given. I just believe that "reason" must be based in fact or reality. Simply because one says something or "believes" something to be true, doesn't mean it is true. There's only one poster I have not responded to with sound argument. And his post is very long and very involved. I don't have the mental energy at this time to respond to it, but I "heard" the reasons.
Also, I'm not questioning "why Paul isn't supported"; I'm asking why Romney and not Paul. No one has given me a solid answer in response to that question.
as many Paul supporters you’re in denial.
I'm a Palin supporter. Questioning is not the same as denying.
Further he’s been protecting Romney’s flank from day one.
Can you give me specific actions or even words that Ron Paul has made (at least three examples) that would make this a valid statement?