Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: delapaz
Or vote Obama and straight conservative downticket, and get a chance for a real conservative in 2016.

That is BULL EXCREMENT. By all means, crawl over broke glass to vote straight conservative downticket.

But voting for Obama is as nuts as voting for Romney. There's another alternative. I remember what happened to Clinton when 57% of the vote count was against him, and he won on a 43% plurality. He got his ASS KICKED in the mid-terms. I am voting against liberalism in the General because it is the best way to make my vote, an oar in the water, steer the course such that whichever socialist wins, Obama or Romney, wins on as piss-poor a plurality as possible, with a vote count where well over 57% of votes cast, were cast in opposition. It would be a blow to the political gut, power-wise, for whichever liberal statist gets the White House.

A vote FOR Obama is an exceedingly stupid vote.

626 posted on 05/04/2012 11:58:34 AM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]


To: Finny

If this was 1992, and there was a 3rd party candidate that had a significant fraction of the vote I would do as you say. But it’s not.

And that’s not the only thing informing my vote. I truly believe that the USG is about to “hit the wall” financially. I would prefer a Democrat to be in the drivers seat when that happens.

So Obama takes the blame, we teach the GOP a lesson about acceptable nominations, and a crack at a conservative in 2016 to rebuild the economy. Triple play.


654 posted on 05/04/2012 12:27:00 PM PDT by delapaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson