What part of **private** don't you understand?
What part of atelier don't you understand ( a field utterly unrelated to anything I have ever done in my life.) I have NO resume of any kind in this field, and it would in fact be damaging to report this on any other resume in my other former fields of employment.
As for plagiarism: Anyone, at any time, has ( and always has had) full permission from me to use any of my words ( without attribution) to forward the idea that all government K-12 schooling is fundamentally evil and must be completely shut down.
Freepers:
Please note the personal attacks directed at my character by people who claim to be professional government teachers. Personally, I trust that because of their training in our nation's colleges of education they would **never** attempt in the classroom to discredit an argument by destroying the character of an intellectually undeveloped student who is in a position of inferior power.
(Freepers, please note that there is no sarcasm tag.)
?For those of you that are not fluent in wintertime this translates to: Verga is correct I am doing this so I don't have to try and actually make a difference in the lives of children I can just sit in front of the computer and whine.
As for plagiarism: Anyone, at any time, has ( and always has had) full permission from me to use any of my words ( without attribution) to forward the idea that all government K-12 schooling is fundamentally evil and must be completely shut down.
Plagiarism is illegal and since they did not have prior consent it is just plain wrong, but nice try at trying to cover up. BTW first it was "editorialists" now it is a private school, isn't it funny how you change your story like other people change socks.
Freepers: Please note the personal attacks directed at my character by people who claim to be professional government teachers. Personally, I trust that because of their training in our nation's colleges of education they would **never** attempt in the classroom to discredit an argument by destroying the character of an intellectually undeveloped student who is in a position of inferior power. (Freepers, please note that there is no sarcasm tag.) I think Freepers here are smart enough to realize that pointing out the inconsistencies of your story is not a personal attaacknor it Alinsky tactics. It is simply pointing out Facts, and letting others make judgments for themselves. As opposed to your Alinsky tactics of ad hom by innuendo and trying to bait others into making personal attacks.
They re also smart enough to realize that you have failed for the third time to address Gabz's direct questions.