Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeronL

WRONG! What comes through the clearest is that Hollande is a Socialist,
and Sarko is definitely not. Sarko is the exact opposite. Nicolas Sarkozy is not, and has never been, and never been associated with Socialism or Marxism of any kind.


4 posted on 05/02/2012 5:19:22 PM PDT by Cincinna ( *** NOBAMA 2012 ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Cincinna

He may not be a socialist, but he certainly wasn’t governing as a nationalist when he was selling his sovereignty to the Germans.


7 posted on 05/02/2012 5:37:09 PM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinna

Even the National Front is leftist by our standards.

Has Sarkozy done anything to reduce the size and scope of their government? Sold off state industries? deregulation? things like that?


9 posted on 05/02/2012 7:15:05 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinna

This guy also wanted to use public funds to build MOSQUES and exempt Islam from the Separation of Church and State.

In September 2004, Sarkozy oversaw the reduction of the government ownership stake in France Télécom from 50.4 percent to 41 percent.[39]
Sarkozy backed a partial nationalisation of the large engineering company Alstom decided by his predecessor when the company was exposed to bankruptcy in 2003.[40]
In June 2004, Sarkozy reached an agreement with the major retail chains in France to concertedly lower prices on household goods by an average of two percent; the success of this measure is disputed, with studies suggesting that the decrease was close to one percent in September.[41]
Taxes: Sarkozy avoided taking a position on the ISF (solidarity tax on wealth). This is considered an ideological symbol by many on the left and right. Some in the business world and on the liberal right, such as Alain Madelin, wanted it abolished. For Sarkozy, that would have risked being categorised by the left as a gift to the richest classes of society at a time of economic difficulties.

He also supported affirmative action and crap.

....

He is NOT a conservative by US standards by any stretch.


10 posted on 05/02/2012 7:27:19 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson