Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom Hoefling: "Mitt Romney is still a pro-choice democrat, and admits it on his own website"
Tom Hoefling for President 2012 ^ | May 2, 2012 | Tom Hoefling

Posted on 05/02/2012 11:22:53 AM PDT by EternalVigilance

Mitt Romney: Judicial supremacist, anti-republican, pro-choice, democrat.

Here's the proof.

Listen to the eight minute audio HERE .

*Excerpted from May 1, 2012 America's Summit, Restore the Republic call


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial
KEYWORDS: democrats; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-197 next last
To: Colofornian

Watch how few of them even try any more to deny that Romney is a pro-choice democrat. It’s remarkable.

Romney Republicans have stripped all meaning away from the word “republican.”


21 posted on 05/02/2012 11:56:03 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (The Obama/Romney math: 0+0=0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: fireforeffect

“I wonder how much of these “Romney is really a (insert your phobia here)” post are by Obama supporters”

Romney is for gay marriage. I wonder how many of you Romney (insert your own sexual perversion) are homosexuals.*


22 posted on 05/02/2012 12:02:11 PM PDT by tumblindice (*FR's Class of 2004: `On the Down Low for Mitt')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fireforeffect
So the choice is a partial conservative (fiscal)...

No, Romney is a full-blown socialist. He pushed through the model for ObamaCare.

I note that you have stipulated to the fact that Mitt Romney is a judicial supremacist, anti-republican, pro-choice, democrat.

And you think I should deploy my sacred franchise in support of one of those, right?

That’s what you’re saying?

23 posted on 05/02/2012 12:02:58 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The Obama/Romney math: 0+0=0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

If memory serves and I read it correctly:

You are the “Tom Hoefling for President 2012” in this post.

Correct?


24 posted on 05/02/2012 12:04:19 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HwyChile
The choice is between Obama and Romney.

Wrong..there is a third choice...NOA...because Romney nor Obama are superior to the other.

Definition Choice:

...Choose, select, pick, elect, prefer indicate a decision that one or more possibilities are to be regarded more highly than others. ....Choose suggests a decision on one of a number of possibilities because of its apparent superiority.

25 posted on 05/02/2012 12:05:46 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Watch how few of them even try any more to deny that Romney is a pro-choice democrat. It’s remarkable. Romney Republicans have stripped all meaning away from the word “republican.”

Yeah...I can hear their ancestors now...if any of them were in America in the 1770s...

Taxation without representation?...Well, I'd rather vote with the Brits than a dead future pol like a wannabe president like George Washington

They've learned well from the Democrats: Sell your kids & grandkids down river; mortgage their future; refuse to bite the bullet now (politically & morally); don't make a stand anywhere; relativistically compromise and capitulate everywhere 'cause ya know, ya gotta have that (r) place @ the table!

26 posted on 05/02/2012 12:06:02 PM PDT by Colofornian (Mom when I grow up, I want 2B like Ike. Mom when I grow up, I want 2B a god from Kolob like Mitt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

You’ve nailed it.


27 posted on 05/02/2012 12:08:51 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The Obama/Romney math: 0+0=0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HwyChile

“You stink like a liberal democrat.”

Ann “Sticks” Coulter is that you? That sweet talk doesn’t work with me anymore, babe.
You Romney fellators make me sick.


28 posted on 05/02/2012 12:09:16 PM PDT by tumblindice (*FR's Class of 2004: `On the Down Low for Mitt')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

“I think the old standby definitions of who votes for which party have been blown away in this campaign. I think people recognize that I’m not a partisan Republican—that I’m someone who is moderate, and that my views are progressive.”
-Mitt Romney (2002)

Video of the quote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMcjJEXt9To

Obama continued: “I am somebody who is no doubt progressive. I believe in a tax code that we need to make more fair. I believe in universal health care. I believe in making college affordable. I believe in paying our teachers more money. I believe in early childhood education. I believe in a whole lot of things that make me progressive.”
-Barack Obama
http://www.progressive.org/mag/nichols0109.html


29 posted on 05/02/2012 12:12:18 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

Yes, he is running for President...rather neat we have such one on our threads....what I’ve read on his site certainly indicates he’s a Conservative in every sense of the word.

You might visit his site ...interesting and informative with links to other good sites as well. Alan Keyes for one...though he didn’t win nobody could argue Keyes wasn’t spot on in his positions.

I remember Keyes running...it was exciting to see him go as far as he did, many wouldn’t have thought that possible. He was more popular than most realized. He had a strong message no doubt and still has interesting things to say today.


30 posted on 05/02/2012 12:13:03 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Good post.


31 posted on 05/02/2012 12:15:03 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The Obama/Romney math: 0+0=0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: caww; EternalVigilance

Yeah. Really neat.

And neat how Keyes lost to Obama too.

Tom is campaigning here against Romney. I’m wondering why he didn’t run and campaign against him in the primary and save us all then.


32 posted on 05/02/2012 12:15:44 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

It’s Romney or Obama. How much dumber can you get? If you don’t like Romeny, go vote for Obama.


33 posted on 05/02/2012 12:19:47 PM PDT by HwyChile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Republicans are running a pro Romney-care candidate versus a pro Obama-care candidate..

What are “they” thinking?..

Are they thinking?... What are they thinking about?..
Could be the republican hierarchy wants Universal Health-care..

Occams Razor demands that they Do....
Are republicans loyal to the pack like dogs....
Subservient dogs.. generally this may be true..

Democrats are indeed drones in the collective, in the Hive..
Could be republicans are like wolves slaves to the pack...

You may be either in the Hive or the Pack.. What are you?..
Times running out for you to decide...


34 posted on 05/02/2012 12:22:00 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Tom is campaigning here against Romney.

It's a free country. And it's Jim Robinson's website. Apparently you're not him, so I won't sweat it.

I’m wondering why he didn’t run and campaign against him in the primary and save us all then.

Well, we can't leave you wondering, now can we?

It's because I figured out beyond any shadow of doubt four years ago that the Republican presidential nominating process is now completely corrupt, completely rigged against conservatives and conservatism, and completely given over to the control of the liberal media and the liberal money interests.

Pretty simple really.

35 posted on 05/02/2012 12:22:42 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The Obama/Romney math: 0+0=0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

I made my decision four years ago.


36 posted on 05/02/2012 12:24:00 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The Obama/Romney math: 0+0=0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

I don’t see him as campaigning here at all...he’s offered reasonable and well thought out opinions worth the read.

For that matter... we sure as heck see many Romney
Supporters here campaigning for the Romney vote!!! I’ll take all conservative opinion over those!

Besides he’s been posting here ever since I’ve been here...I checked...so it’s not like people aren’t aware. I’m glad he’s here....others can just scroll by if they choose...as any other poster they might not want to engage with.

Choice...is a wonderful thing!


37 posted on 05/02/2012 12:25:09 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: HwyChile; Jim Robinson
If you don't like Romeny, go vote for Obama and get off this board.

Wow! Hey, Jim! We've got a self-proclaimed FreeRepublic cop - and he's telling anyone who doesn't like Romney to take a hike!

38 posted on 05/02/2012 12:25:09 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (FUMR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
And neat how Keyes lost to Obama too.

Yeah, well, part of the reason for that is that he just couldn't overcome the opposition of those who have now become Romney Republicans.

This is a process we're going through, you see.

But, eventually, the truth will out, as they say.

39 posted on 05/02/2012 12:27:03 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The Obama/Romney math: 0+0=0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Thanks. You figured out you couldn’t win. We should all start our own parties and be our own nominee.

Seriously: if you can’t beat Romney in a primary, you darn sure can’t beat him in the general.

Also, it would be nice if you campaigned against Obama too, if only to show “balance.”

What’s your strategy for beating Virgil Goode?


40 posted on 05/02/2012 12:27:09 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-197 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson