Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mandaladon

I suppose they just can’t see that by continuing these racially motivated crimes, packs of blacks attacking whites, they are just begging for whites to have no choice but to be prepared to shoot them dead in self-defense. That’s why they’re trying to nip defensive gun laws such as “Stand Your Ground” in the bud, to make it safe for the black criminal attackers and leave the white victims at their mercy and no threat to their attackers.

The media is playing its part in never reporting these incidents, but it’s going to bite them in the azz because people still learn about them from other sources and people have to start putting 2 and 2 together and wondering why these incidents, considering the preponderance of black on white crime, isn’t being reported, while any relatively rare white on black attack is made an occasion for reinforcement of White Guilt. It just doesn’t add up, and the race hustlers, DWL, and the media are conspiring in it-can they not see that they have become so blatant that they are way overplaying their hand and forcing people to ask questions-not the questions “they” wanted, either-about why this is being framed this way?


25 posted on 05/01/2012 5:05:09 PM PDT by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmel
I suppose they just can’t see that by continuing these racially motivated crimes, packs of blacks attacking whites, they are just begging for whites to have no choice but to be prepared to shoot them dead in self-defense. That’s why they’re trying to nip defensive gun laws such as “Stand Your Ground” in the bud, to make it safe for the black criminal attackers and leave the white victims at their mercy and no threat to their attackers.

Even in the absence of "stand your ground laws," under the commonlaw and the statutes in many states, a person has an obligation to retreat only if they reasonably believe that they can do so with complete safety to themself and others. In other words, if a person reasonably believes that they cannot retreat without risk of death or serious bodily injury to themself or another perosn, then they have the right to use deadly force.

88 posted on 05/02/2012 4:38:39 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson