Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut1
"polls say 97 percent of working climate scientists scientists who suck on the teat of AGW grants now see global warming as a serious risk."

Fixed it.

3 posted on 05/01/2012 10:30:23 AM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bolobaby; DBrow
My thoughts exactly, and you beat me to it.

"97 percent of working climate scientists now see global warming as a serious risk."

Headline from the 1930's - '40's:

"Lysenko Vindicated! ...97% of working Soviet biologists see plant genetics as a reactionary bourgeois plot."

20 posted on 05/01/2012 10:55:17 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Just the facts, ma'am, just the facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: bolobaby

great fix.
Here is a full rebuttal to the New York Times today. The 97% figure relies on 77 Anonymous Persons Who Answered 2 questions that most skeptics would answer yes to.
Here is rebuttal:

http://climatedepot.com/a/15709/NYT-Reporter-Justin-Gillis-Does-it-Again-Author-of-Worst-NYT-Story-on-Climate-Ever—gets-even-worse

NYT Reporter Justin Gillis Does it Again! Author of ‘Worst NYT Story on Climate Ever’ — gets even worse!
‘Gillis has officially reduced himself to the equivalent of a newsletter writer for climate pressure groups. Just when you thought his reporting cannot get any worse, he surprises us again’


32 posted on 05/01/2012 12:23:52 PM PDT by ClimateDepot.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson