Leftist may lose a battle now and then, but they know how to win the war. We could learn a lot by studying their methods and perseverance.
The “antiwar” and “anitgun” hypocrite leftists (who nevertheless play the lottery, gamble and do all kinds of money redistribution protective rackets with guns and gang warfare), have this thing where they create a war-situation without explicitly sending the idiots to war, or letting them know about it, using them as provocation pieces. War occures because of “circumstances”, whereas the right uses precedents, casus bellis and law to start them.
Given the state of anarchy and the left’s cowardice, it distances itself with PC language from looking as if they are burdening their people with slavery, war and what not other pain-relief schemes which allows their evil minions to carry out in total callousness and mindless feellessness terrible wars that they do not have to feel for, via government proxies, psychos and radical butt numbed homosexual islamists like Obama.
We concentrate on one thing at a time while they chew away at the foundations all around us.
Some of us are a little better at watching the big picture but its like herding cats to get others focused on more than a few things at once.
Since the left uses “arranged marriage” techniques and selfbrainwashing and insanity, it would indeed behooves on the right to distance itself from the leftist trap rhetoric, answering questions about our intentions as to whether we are going to drop a nuke or not, here and there.
We have to distance ourselves from the warmongering slogans of Obama, as they are not inclusive terms, but only terms to move himself “forward”, as himself the end, whereas the rest of us idiots are just the means.
So when Zero says Romney would have never ordered to kill Bin Laden, he plays the callous card, while inserting ROmney inside a progressist war rhetoric, making him carry the waters.
These people are diabolical, because theirs is a politically correct slavery that involves utopia, painlessness and a leader who is “equal and not a leader”, while clearly engaging in social circles that have definite hyerarchies of insiderism.
Gingrich had an inkling in their language, ROmney has no clue and is a back stabbing knee jerking wuss carrying the waters against conservatives for the liberals, while compromising himself as a CEO, sending the liberals to whore themselves to sell his crap chinese products.
This is why they got Romney by the balls and he is unelectable. His do nothing and weak meek approach is not well liked nor decisive. He really has no plan but to try to say the right things and then resuming being the little butt boy of right side utopian “no pink elephant gangster, head in sand” liberalism like Bloomberg.