Replies

Oh, so Gorbachev doesn’t have a home on the Presidio? He doesn’t run Green Cross International? What facts were not presented?

I find it amusing that you claim you like a ‘friendly’ discussion. You never discussed anything. You just started posting insults. You were never friendly or cordial.

Now you have to call in a ‘friend’ so you can continue your tirade, but fail to address me, which I have been told is a violation of the forum etiquette.

Inviting communists into your country at taxpayer expense is like inviting a pedophile to babysit your children. Harm will be done as has been illustrated over and over again on this forum.

Ending the cold war turned out to be a very bad thing for the American people. It has helped the free traitors make their communist buddies very wealthy though, I have to admit.

Oh, so Gorbachev doesn’t have a home on the Presidio? He doesn’t run Green Cross International? What facts were not presented?

How about your providing a figure on how much money Gorbachev has "stolen" (your word), and explaining how he is to be indicted for "treason" when he a.) is not a citizen and b.) hasn't met the definition for treason, since you are unable to expand on your allegation. Furthermore, you have failed to present a clear and demonstrable link between 'Green Cross International' and the 'Green Nazi Movement' in Germany you claim exists.

I find it amusing that you claim you like a ‘friendly’ discussion. You never discussed anything. You just started posting insults. You were never friendly or cordial.

That's because your post #12 started off with a conspiratorial presumption that America did NOT win the Cold War, which is a damnable lie. I responded with a humorous post and graphic depicting you as a tin foil hat wearing hedgetrimmer (personally created with no small effort I might add) and demonstrating exactly what I was talking about in my post #39, rather than attempt to prove the validity of your views, to produce evidence of your claims, you defaulted to mewling about 'alinsky' and my follow up response was more than appropriate. Sorry if I offended your oh-so-delicate sensitivities Madam.

Now you have to call in a ‘friend’ so you can continue your tirade, but fail to address me, which I have been told is a violation of the forum etiquette.

So bloody what? I'll ping anyone I please, and you don't have a damn thing to say about it. StephenJohnBanker and I had already been sharing a private FReepmail chuckle about you, so it was a courtesy to him. Your only response to him was that his comment "didn't make any sense". As for "violating forum etiquette" (**GASP**), I responded to SJB's post, not to you, and you can take your indignation, roll it into a fine tube, and insert it in whichever one of your orifices will accommodate it, how's that?

And oh yes: ROTATE on it.

Inviting communists into your country at taxpayer expense is like inviting a pedophile to babysit your children. Harm will be done as has been illustrated over and over again on this forum.

Now pay close attention here: WHAT DO YOU PROPOSE TO DO ABOUT IT? You keep ranting, you keep beating the drum, now tell us WHAT IS YOUR SOLUTION and HOW DO YOU INTEND TO IMPLEMENT IT?

Ending the cold war turned out to be a very bad thing for the American people. It has helped the free traitors make their communist buddies very wealthy though, I have to admit.

So what you are saying then, is that you would prefer to live in a world where the Berlin Wall never fell, Gorbachev was overthrown in that coup attempt by the military, perhaps Vladimir Putin eventually assumed the Chairmanship of the Politburo, the East European slave states of the Soviet Union remained under the control of Moscow, the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania never became free, Ceausescu in Romania was never overthrown but increased his dictatorial oppression of his people, the Ukraine (which you mentioned) remained firmly in the grip of the Soviets, and let's not forget that North Korea continued to receive substantial assistance from their Communist neighbor, and to wind this up, you believe that it would be a better world to have a fully armed and prepared Soviet nuclear arsenal maintained, and aimed at the United States?

That's the kinda world you're embracing if you think the end of the Cold War was a "very bad thing for the American people". If you really believe that, you're not just a nut, you're an EFFIN' nut!