[Colofornian]

There is nothing worse than Obumo— period. Nothing.

Oh sure there is.

Well.

Not this election.

But just wait.

Some future election.

Where we have the kids & grandkids of pro-Romney FR supporters like TexasCajun; ladymac; luvbach1; Lou L; Wiggen; fish hawk; Mr. Lucky; Ge0frrey; G Larry; Dawebman; tnlibertarian; vikingd00d; knarf; and others in this thread (or others who will come on posting)....

In that future election, there'll be some (r) candidate to the left of Obama runnin' for POTUS...

And because we can ALWAYS count on the (D) candidate being worse, the next-generation(s) relativists of the current FR relativistic cabal will be verbally harassing [some mild, some not] the remnant conservatives for not-voting for the guy/gal-to-the-left-of-Obama as a "better" "lesser of two evils'" "choice."

You buy into political relativism...you get the eternal fruits of it...and a "wonderful" legacy passed on to future generations...

With this kind of active spirit among so-called "conservatives," makes you wonder why the Founding Fathers of this country simply just wouldn't go along with taxation-without representation (& other issues) from the Brits...

Sad. So many FREEPERs today are capitulators & compromisers who bear absolutely NO resemblance to the Founding Fathers' rebellion-is-brewing spirit.

Hence, their need where they have to convert the rest of us. Why? Because we're living reminders to their relativistic conscience that they are searing their conscience with this "waterloo" type of political crossover.

[INVAR]

Excellently stated and seconded!

AMEN!!

[tnlibertarian]

So, go hold your breath until you get your way. Take your ball and go home. I don't give a rat's patootie. Just, don't pretend to be a Revolutionary War patriot because you're pouting over the winner of the Republican nomination.

[wiggen]

Did you want to go there? You know once someone pulled out the ‘i’m a real conservative card’ on me. Of course to him,as to you the only conservative was someone that agreed with him. You understand that narrow minded approach guarantees nothing but smaller and smaller cliques as time passes. The intended insult of labeling us ‘so called conservatives’. What does the word conservative mean to you?
Constitution? Does it contain fiscal policy as well? Give us “so called conservatives” your definition so we know what we have to live up to. But if i were you i’d make it good because you threw a bunch of names into your insult.

As to trying to convince you it was certainly never my intent. The article at top however was designed to get as many people to sit out the election as possible.
This is a forum. An article is posted. People enter opinions from more than two sides of a questions. That’s what goes on here. If i wanted to go where there was only one opinion allowed i’d be elsewhere.

[bossmechanic]

You and INVAR really come across as a couple of self-stroking anarchists. I really think both of you need some counseling. Reality is a Mistress not to be ignored.

[fish hawk]

Having a “life time view” and a “world view/ big picture view” is just a wonderful thing. BUT it helps to take each circumstance as it comes your way and deal with it straight on. Right now you will be confronted with Obama vs. Romney, like it or not. So you write in your own name or someone else that has no chance what soever. How is that helping your ,say, grandson who already owes the government over $50,000? I'll tell you a big secret, if you really want to know the future, read the Book of Revelation. According to that, we are right where we should be at this time in history. I challenge you to find America in that book. Where do you think it went?