I wouldn’t swear that the two photos are of the same woman, but the one on the right I don’t think is Stanley, eyes are different. Also appears to have curly hair. Eyebrow shape is different.
And whatever else SAD may or may not have been, I don’t think she was the kind of woman to pose for nudie photos. But that is just MHO.
Don’t forget, we are now expected to believe that the photographs were found in a ‘house’ (he lived in an a small apartment after his divorce) which Frank Marshall Davis hadn’t occupied for at least 13 years, and who is telling us this? The same man who admits he saw the images on the website from which the images had already been removed when I traced them at least two years ago...a website which is now no longer current, a website which had a section totally devoted to antique images of girls wearing nothing but stockings and high heeled shoes.
Frank Marshall Davis, as you can see by the images I posted, was already a 55 yo old man when SAD supposedly arrived in Hawaii in 1960...(although only Abercrombie maintains he ever saw her)...Frank was married to Helen Canfield, they lived some 35 miles out of Honolulu in a beach shack, they had five children...and HOW any images belonging to FMD would survive after his divorce in the 70’s IN HIS HOUSE is beyond me.
Aside from all this, the images of the young women show they were two different people.
It’s all quite ridiculous imo, and only appeals to those who have a vested interest in perpetuating the myth of a Hawaii birth and/or US citizenship.