[philman_36]

Wow, all of that instead of simply answering my question...
And from whence did Black draw his definition? Thin air?
In other words, did he use somebody else's writings/works for his definition? If so, who or what?

He drew the definition of native solely from Wong Kim Ark? Where did Wong Kim Ark draw it's definition?

You have lost all credibility.
To whom? You alone?

I am closing out the thread on you.
Translation...I'm running away.

[New Jersey Realist]

Translation: I’m running away.

---

No

“If you argue with an idiot, there are two idiots” – Robert Kiyosaki

“Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.” – Mark Twain

[philman_36]

Where did Wong Kim Ark draw it's definition?

Hint...Chancellor Kent, in his Commentaries, speaking of the "general division of the inhabitants of every country under the comprehensive title of aliens and natives,"...
@kent commentaries
Lect. 25: Of Aliens and Natives

And here...
These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further, and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction, without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class, there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case, it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.
Minor v. Happersett (1874), 21 Wall. 162, 166-168.

So from whence did Minor v. Happersett draw it's definition of natives?