“Let’s see. Mormons are pro-life. Mormons support traditional marriage. Mormons as a voting block are more conservative than most. Mitt, on the other hand, isn’t pro-life. Mitt doesn’t support gay marriage. Mitt is, for all intensive purposes a liberal. Hmmmm... story doesn’t hold water.”
If you’re familiar with Mormon doctrine you’re aware of how all the committed members have their lives focused to qualify for the all-important Temple Recommend...and that Bishop “I love to fire people” Romney would himself have “graded” LDS member ad decided whether they were worthy of a piece of paper necessary for their Celestial Kingdom and Godhood. Well, anyhow ;^)
What I’m saying, is you’re seeing how a Mormon boy qualifies for his Temple Recommend, except it’s a different Temple. He knows he’s not perfect, he’sdelivering what he thinks his questioners want to hear.
What I, as an ex born in the LDS, wonder is...
Romney is agood mormon of high standing, which, excuse me, means he’s been an obedient cultist who has obeyed and genuflected before higher mormon authority his entire life, men who literally hold his hopes of the Celestial Kingdom and his Godhood in their hands...he has told people what they wanted to hear, and kissed holy rump whenever necessary to fulfill his destiny...
And when he achieves it, he will for the first time, more powerful tham the men who made him God.
He was the servant, he is now the master. The baby’s found the gun.
Bump to post #30...well said!
I hope that you develop that explanation more in the future, that was choppy and quick, but very interesting.