We could "win" a landslide by nominating Lincoln Chaffee who is about as "Republican" as Romney and governs just as conservatively (not at all), or, imagine the landslide if we nominated Her Imperial Hillaryness. Now, it is true that either of those two would push back against any vestigial and limp attempts at, well, Republicanism, but the truckload of spineless wimps infesting the GOP caucuses of BOTH houses of Congress can hardly be depended upon to do actually "Republican" things and they certainly cannot be described as a "conservative Congress" awaiting the 2016 election of an actually conservative POTUS, whose election they would more certainly resist to the last drop of their collective blood. A conservative POTUS would mean the ability to veto spending bills and, if the "pragmatic GOP members of Congress and the Senate cannot line their pockets, their grandchildren's trust funds and their political contributors' pockets with you money and mine, then just what was the point of being elected?
That is why not to elect Robamney at all much less by a landslide. His election would cause each and every corrupt person and institution in the land to be joyously speaking in tongues.
I disagree....by voting conservative down ballot in 12-14-16 we load the congress with conservatives.....if Romney decides not to push for repeal of obamacare we pass it with a veto proof majority....and if he pushes back against us we run a conservative against him in a primary. It is the belief of this site owner that we should vote straight conservative down ballot. All I am saying is do that and take away the veto from Romney. If he uses it we run someone against him in 16.