“They and NRL both caved in to the “lesser of 2 evils” argument.”
NRL dont feel Romney is in any way ‘evil’ as he supports numerous of the prolife agenda items, like Mexico City policy that Obama undid, returning the Hyde amendment that obama gutted in Obamacare, etc. NRL feels that we need to replace Obama with Romney, who has pledge to appoint constitutionalist Justices like Scalia rather than folks like Kagan. Former prochoicer Romney will likely be as consistent to the prolife items as former prochoicer George HW Bush was when he was President. Not a true believer like Santorum would have been, but at least someone who has signed off on the prolife agenda and not on the side of shoving Planned Parenthood taxpayer money and doing everything he can against us, like Obama is. Obama’s a guy who has endorsed not just abortion but literally infanticide.
So NRL’s decision is pretty simple and obvious. A guy who since 2005 has been self-declared prolife, support and who we can hold his feet to the fire if he goes wobbly, vs a guy who is 100% totally and adamantly opposed to the values we hold.
Wosg, you’ve always been a straight shooter. Honestly, don’t you think it’s a little odd that sba puts out a pledge, that not one of the people who agreed with their pledge ever got endorsed, but that the one guy who refused to make their pro-life pledge did get endorsed.
And that only after his nomination looked inevitable.
I smell white-washed sepulchres filled with dead men’s bones.