Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jboot

1. Select fire weapons are worthless to the individual. It just wastes ammo. You only use it in large-scale operations for suppressive fire.

2. If I can find ammo, I can probably find the weapon that goes with it.

3. 7.62x39 is much cheaper than .223. I can store more of it with me in that SHTF situation. And you can’t beat the Russian spam can.

4. The 7.62x54R is very cheap and the Mosin-Nagant rifle is easy to find and inexpensive. Good deer rifle.

5. Saiga 12 - 12 gauge AK :)


22 posted on 04/25/2012 6:34:35 AM PDT by Azeem (There are four boxes to be used in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury and ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Azeem

That is my next purchase, an AK.


26 posted on 04/25/2012 6:42:38 AM PDT by Sybeck1 (If Romney needs my vote to win Mississippi, he is in a heck of a lot trouble more than me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Azeem
All your points are valid. Here are some comments:

1. When SHTF, individual actors will die regardless of what they are armed with. Teamwork and organization are keys to survival. Within that paradigm, large-scale operations are not out of scope.

2. True, but with the exception of 5.56 not in quantity.

3. Cheap yes. Endless no. SHTF will require a constant supply of ammo, magazines and spare parts.

4. Love the Mosins. The M44 would be my first and only choice for a wilderness survival rifle. But in a SHTF scenario Mosins will have limited utility.

5. Sounds like fun!

36 posted on 04/25/2012 7:50:09 AM PDT by jboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson