Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/23/2012 6:15:02 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: pabianice

With a Republican majority in the House? Not very likely.


2 posted on 04/23/2012 6:16:53 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

It has been in the make for years. Another change being speculated is that IRAs will not be transferrable upon death. We stopped contributing several years ago.


3 posted on 04/23/2012 6:17:39 AM PDT by greatvikingone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

No safe place from the tax man.


4 posted on 04/23/2012 6:20:33 AM PDT by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

462M? They’re pretty accurate when they have to be. Looks like another distraction.


5 posted on 04/23/2012 6:21:55 AM PDT by ILS21R (John Locke: When the social contract is broken, the people must revolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

They do that and it’s Civil War II.


6 posted on 04/23/2012 6:22:57 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

Taxing my 401K would turn it into a Roth IRA.


7 posted on 04/23/2012 6:23:15 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

So much for the lie that anyone who makes less than $250,00(or was it $200,000) won’t pay a dime more in tax. I bet union run pension plans will be exempt from any new tax.


8 posted on 04/23/2012 6:25:57 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

The money grubbing feral hogs in Washington never sleep.


10 posted on 04/23/2012 6:31:47 AM PDT by Iron Munro (If Repub's paid as much attention to Rush Limbaugh as the Dem's do, we wouldn't be in this mess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

For only $462M? That’s a drop in the bucket...so why bother. Bet it’s more like $462 Billion, perhaps? Either way, they’re going to try and do whatever they can to confiscate more of America’s wealth. Never any mention, though, of cost cutting, correct?


11 posted on 04/23/2012 6:33:10 AM PDT by nfldgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

They want to raise $462 Million? For what? You can’t even buy a baseball team with that. In the grand scheme of government spending, $462M is an awfully small, awfully specific number. The bailout alone was $700 Billion.

This is a trial balloon. It’ll never get past the House.

SnakeDoc


14 posted on 04/23/2012 6:37:05 AM PDT by SnakeDoctor ("I've shot people I like more for less." -- Raylan Givens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
to raise approximately $462M.

Wow! That's like $1.50 for every man, woman and child in the US! That's hugh! I'm series!

15 posted on 04/23/2012 6:39:44 AM PDT by Onelifetogive (I tweet, too... @Onelifetogive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

Investment killing government thugs...apparently they can’t see the unintended consequences of this nonsense. Or perhaps that’s what they’re counting on?


16 posted on 04/23/2012 6:41:48 AM PDT by Mich Patriot (We can't have economic progress...there is a slug somewhere that needs to be saved. MP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

462 million is what, about an hour’s worth of interest accumulation on the Federal deb?


17 posted on 04/23/2012 6:42:46 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

They’re already using the postal workers’ retirement funds as a source of money to support the Congress’s lack of fiscal discipline, endangering the future of the US Postal Service.


19 posted on 04/23/2012 6:44:17 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

This is something that they have been talking about for a while. I didn’t know about making the IRA’s non transferrable upon death though. We have been watching and have considered pulling the money out and paying the taxes on it if they are going to do it anyway.


20 posted on 04/23/2012 6:45:48 AM PDT by she geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
prior thread from Sunday on NY Post article.

Plus Wall Street Journal article on it.

21 posted on 04/23/2012 6:46:33 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

this all-out war for 462 million?


22 posted on 04/23/2012 6:48:19 AM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
The eventual plan is to seize all 401K assets and replace them with a “guaranteed” Federal pension for everyone. One that is “fair”.

****************

I've been waiting for them to try this for years.

The pool of money in 401(k) and IRA accounts is ginormous. There's no way the looters in D.C. can avoid thinking and dreaming about such a treasure chest.

But they won't make their grab directly. That would draw too much heat.

Instead, they'll tack an amendment onto a "mom-and-apple-pie" type of bill, or a Defense appropriations bill, then we'll wake up one morning with the bill already signed and the trucks backing up to our financial institutions.

Vigilance.

24 posted on 04/23/2012 6:57:33 AM PDT by DNME (A monarch's neck should always have a noose around it. It keeps him upright. — Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
401K
28 posted on 04/23/2012 7:02:13 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

I saw a similar article over the weekend. Not that I wouldn’t put it past a liberal Democrat to want to seize 401(k) monies, they did not name names in the reference. The did that the the “government” and “Uncle Sam” wanted to get their hands on our 401(k)s. Who, specifically?


30 posted on 04/23/2012 7:22:58 AM PDT by Lou L (The Senate without a filibuster is just a 100-member version of the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson