Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: greyfoxx39; All

What in the name of all goodness is asking someone not to come with the intent to cause trouble do you not understand?

Did I say I owned anything here?

You absolutely misrepresent me. I have shame for you.

You dare say you liked to come to this thread because it had enlightened conversation, YET, others coming onto the thread to start trouble are somehow people you are going to defend and attack me about it?

Let me tell you, when people seek to get others banned or reported to the boss, that does NOT reek of enlightened conversation, that reeks of trouble making.

The biggest problem I have is not that people disagree or even argue, but rather we’ve found a fault line over Romney, that some will actually want other FReepers banned over because they didn’t join the daily hatred song against him.

Not one of the regular posters here are Romney supporters. I, Rod, Altura, Miss Marple, Bray, Kabar, Morgan in Denver, Rocklobster, Fishtalk, and all the rest have supported OTHER candidates only to see them either not take the flag or lose.

We CAN argue the fact that Obama is worse than Romney, but to ban people for thinking so, or cussing them out, or belittling them as Romneybots is just, well, unfair and unwanted by most here.

WE try hard to avoid that here.... As you said, enlightened conversation. Can you argue your points without accusing me of such nonsense?

You absolutely are wrong to even think this was a desire to make this a closed or caucus thread—no way, no how...

I ask others to tell me if that’s what they think I was getting on about.


187 posted on 04/22/2012 5:50:57 PM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: Alas Babylon!; Diogenesis
You absolutely are wrong to even think this was a desire to make this a closed or caucus thread—no way, no how...

You replied to Diogenesis' Post #67 with a request that he "not come onto this thread with the intent to cause trouble."

I see nothing in post 67 other than facts about Romney. I fail to see where that is "causing trouble", and if you are going to declare posting rules on your thread over and above the normal FR rules, there should be a disclaimer at the beginning of the thread.

Mind-reading another FReeper and accusing them of "attempting to get others banned" with no proof of such is tantamount to casting shame on other FReepers for "misrepresenting" you....oh wait.

To quote you, "but to ban people for thinking so, or cussing them out, or belittling them as Romneybots is just, well, unfair and unwanted by most here."

Go back through the thread and read the comments made to Diogenisis by the "regulars". Belittling and piling on seems to be an appropriate descripton of the sentiments toward him for daring to post comments that are don't fit the thread template.

You state, "WE try hard to avoid that here"... This is your territory, and now others are aware to give it a wide berth as I have for several years.

One note...there have been posts on this thread regarding the low number of posts compared to the past. Perhaps there is a reason for it.

192 posted on 04/22/2012 6:45:46 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (I do not expect the (FR) house to fall - but I do expect it will cease to be divided-Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson