Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sola Veritas

“A proper judge (but courageous as well) would simply toss the case.......”
******************************************************
I agree. A proper AND COURAGEOUS judge would dismiss it. However, I suspect that’s not going to happen. The first judge probably quickly realized it was an empty case but didn’t want to place her in a place where she’d have to make that rule—so that’s why she bailed out. “Conflict of interest” my foot—it was pure cowardliness.


38 posted on 04/21/2012 4:16:08 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: House Atreides

“I agree. A proper AND COURAGEOUS judge would dismiss it. However, I suspect that’s not going to happen.”

I think you entirely correct, but one can aways hope.

The judge that dodged was an elected one. An elected judge is fried no matter what they do. If they don’t toss, the white population will vote him/her out of office. If they proceed and don’t get a conviction, the black population will potentially threaten his/her life. Sucks to be a judge there right now.


46 posted on 04/21/2012 4:28:25 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson