To: JesseWatters
Damnable lawyer prefaced his questions with “after the crime”...
Any answer Zimmerman gave after that point implicitly admitted that shooting the punk was a crime.
3 posted on
04/20/2012 8:46:12 AM PDT by
null and void
(Day 1186 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made Frank, they're cornered...])
To: null and void
He has already been charged with the crime of 2nd degree murder. This is what the lawyer is referencing.
5 posted on
04/20/2012 8:54:18 AM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: null and void
My thought too. Why was Zimmerman’s lawyer not objecting to the way the question was framed?
6 posted on
04/20/2012 8:54:39 AM PDT by
shove_it
(just undo it)
To: null and void
the prosecutor sounded like a jackass in his badgering!
11 posted on
04/20/2012 9:00:01 AM PDT by
shoedog
To: null and void
I noticed that - at least his lawyer should have objected.
12 posted on
04/20/2012 9:04:01 AM PDT by
skeeter
To: null and void
Damnable lawyer prefaced his questions with “after the crime”... Any answer Zimmerman gave after that point implicitly admitted that shooting the punk was a crime. The crime was attempted murder. After the crime in which Trayvon Martin attempted to kill Zimmerman, the victim took the actions that he described in his testimony.
17 posted on
04/20/2012 9:11:12 AM PDT by
Pollster1
(Can we afford as much government as welfare-addicted voters demand?)
To: null and void
Damnable lawyer prefaced his questions with “after the crime”...That struck me too. Why didn't his lawyer intervene?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson