[FedsRStealingOurCountryFromUs]

What? I think you forgot that we have a regime who does what they damn well please. There's no Constitutional grounds for 0bamacare either.. Or challenging Voter ID Laws (which SCOTUS just upheld as recently as April 2008), or refusing to uphold DOMA or immigration laws which is a clear violation of his oath of office to do so. Let's not forgot the Libyan war not approved by Congress either. Anyway, you catch my drift. And with all due respect of course.

Martial Law wouldn't be called 'Martial Law' per se.. It would be a National Guard action, not all that unlike what occurred during the Watts Riots in the '60's or the L.A. Riot in 92.. Recent Executive Orders have expanded 0bama's powers when it comes to domestic military actions, and even killing American citizens without oversight. And so on, and so on. I wish your Constitutional citing had relevance but not under this presidency, unfortunately.

[FedsRStealingOurCountryFromUs]

Forgot to tell you that there were also U.S. ARMY and MARINES in the L.A. Riot zone in ‘92, providing ‘cover’ for police and firemen.