Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GonzoGOP
Mahmoud shows up at the airport with a nuke he is endangering his innocent neighbours with it.
9 posted on 04/18/2012 9:31:02 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: ArrogantBustard
He is endangering his innocent neighbours with it.

Devils Advocate Mode

How so? He is merely possessing a weapon. Just like that 22LR you spoke of. If there are no limits you can't do anything until after he uses the weapon.

/Devils Advocate Mode

Or is there some limit based on the destructiveness of the weapon in question? And if so where is that limit to be set, and who sets it? Because the libs are going to want to set it at pointed sticks. So when they try we need to have our arguments fleshed out and responses ready.

I want to win this argument. To be honest I have never been able to come up with a good way to draw that line. An AK-47 should be legal. A nuke shouldn't be. But there is a lot of gray between those two points on the right to bear arms continuum.
11 posted on 04/18/2012 9:40:06 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson