To: ArrogantBustard
Carrying one, for example, in an airport necessarily exposes other folks to a radiological hazard.
Never dealt with the buggers have you. No radiological hazard as long as the casing is in place. A properly built nuke is without doubt the safest weapons system ever developed. In fact they are a heck of a lot safer than that .22LR. People get accidentally killed or injured by firearms all the time. There is almost no way to be accidentally injured by a nuke, short of dropping it on your foot. If you set one off it is usually because you intended to.
So answer the question does Mr Al Queda get to have his nukes or not? If not you are not looking at an unrestricted human right.
24 posted on
04/18/2012 11:15:36 AM PDT by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: GonzoGOP
As I said: Furthermore, the airport owner and the air carriers are no more required to let their customers bring nukes on their property than they are required to let their customers bring .22 pistols on their property.
25 posted on
04/18/2012 11:17:58 AM PDT by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: GonzoGOP
as long as the casing is in place. A properly built nuke You're assuming facts not in evidence, particularly with Mr. Al Quaeda.
People get accidentally killed or injured by firearms all the time.
No, people get negligently killed or injured by idiots mishandling firearms.
28 posted on
04/18/2012 11:20:52 AM PDT by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson