>> Chill dude, speculation is not “making up lies out of whole cloth.”
Ah, but some forms of speculation are *exactly* lies. Sneaky, subtle lies.
“I wonder if HerrBlucher is a transvestite pedophile.”**
Hey! Chill, dude! I’m just speculating!
But you and I both know that by “speculating” on something denigrating, I’m *purposely* sticking my finger in your eye. And hoping other people take the hint... and then forget the “I wonder” part but retain the “is a _______” part in their minds.
As I tried to get across in my original reply to you — this is EXACTLY how the loathsome agenda driven MSM operates. I can’t think of a better word than loathsome for that sort of “plausible deniability” technique of LYING. It’s not even a *gutsy* lie. And it’s not right. And you know it.
>> Thanks for pinging admin
You’re welcome. I want them to keep an eye on you. I’d prefer if you didn’t pull this crap again! Support who you want to honestly, and don’t pull disingenuous crap like insinuating with zero evidence that Newt’s been bought by Romney, and I won’t annoy you again. DO pull crap like this again, and next time I’ll report it as abuse and reference this incident. Do we have a deal?
** of course, HerrBlucher is NOT that. I’m just making a point.
I am a Newt supporter and will be voting for him in the CA primary regardless of my speculation. I don’t consider it denigrating at all to Newt if what I have speculated is true, provided that Newt is sincerely willing to be Mitts veep (and I hope he is if Mitt gets the nod) and is not doing it just to pay off his debts.
Go ahead and be outraged all you want, you are making a mountain out of a molehill.