Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain

It seems to me that the bill was designed to prevent those who will not obey the “no guns” signs from bringing guns into “sensitive” places by installing thorough screening methods for ALL who enter.
So we continue to disarm the honest subject while those with bad intent walk right in with guns to do their worst with no fear of a good guy being armed and able to prevent or halt their bad intentions.
Or am I confused?


5 posted on 04/18/2012 5:54:03 AM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (Liberals vote the way they feel, conservatives vote the way they think. NRA <BCC><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Blue Collar Christian
It seems to me that the bill was designed to prevent those who will not obey the “no guns” signs from bringing guns into “sensitive” places by installing thorough screening methods for ALL who enter.

You are correct. The bill requires governments that wish to ban weapons in their facilities to actually do so, instead of simply putting up signs that only prevent the law abiding from carrying weapons in their facilities.

15 posted on 04/18/2012 6:55:29 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson